22 slides · web view, PPTX and printable PDF · Arrow keys to move · F to present · Esc to exit
Feasibility Report and Investor Presentation
Specialty coffee shop · Kadıköy Moda, İstanbul · 12+4 seats · 40 m² · 5 September 2026
Ayşe Demir
A 40 m², 12-seat specialty coffee shop in Kadıköy Moda, İstanbul needs a total investment of ₺4.80m: ₺2.06m in fit-out, equipment and furniture and ₺1.04m as a working-capital reserve (4 months of fixed costs).
Break-even needs 66 customers a day, a safety margin of 18%. Pessimistic payback (ticket −10%, occupancy −15%, slow ramp) is not reached within 120 months; optimistic 27 months.
Reading the first year, the 10-year average operating result and the investment return indicators together, the current assumptions do not generate cash that repays the investment; the project does not look sustainable as designed until the payroll ratio and the payback period are reworked.
WEAK — The project generates ₺4.85m of revenue at a -3.6% EBITDA margin in year 1, reaching an average of ₺14.2m and 14.7% over 10 years. The revenue assumption, the cost of goods ratio, other operating costs, the rent burden, the EBITDA margin and operating cash generation look positive, while the payroll ratio, the payback period and the return (IRR) need to be watched closely. On a 30% IRR and a 4.1-year payback, the investment is in need of reworking.
Arka Sokak Kahve is planned as a non-alcoholic specialty coffee shop in Kadıköy Moda, İstanbul.
The difference does not yet show in the numbers: ticket, food cost and payroll all sit inside the district band. A real difference has to appear in either price or cost — if it appears in neither, the claim is undefended in front of an investor.
Capacity is 12 indoor + 4 outdoor seats, 11 hours a day, 30 days a month. Theoretical seat turns 5.5/day; mature occupancy 54% (FIZIBI assumption).
Monthly rent is ₺55,000 (founder estimate, no property selected; private landlord, with 20% withholding the cost to the business is ₺68,750); 1,375 ₺ per m², 12% below the district benchmark.
Roster at opening-month wages; year-2 monthly payroll after the January minimum-wage steps: ₺165k · 24%
| Line | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales (excl. VAT) | ₺4.85m | ₺8.28m | ₺9.65m |
| Cost of goods sold | −₺1.25m | −₺2.11m | −₺2.45m |
| Gross profit | ₺3.60m74% | ₺6.17m75% | ₺7.21m75% |
| Labor (gross + social security) | −₺1.65m | −₺1.98m | −₺2.30m |
| Rent + charges | −₺825k | −₺1.02m | −₺1.21m |
| Platform commissions | ₺0 | ₺0 | ₺0 |
| Other operating costs | −₺1.30m | −₺1.79m | −₺2.09m |
| EBITDA | −₺174k-4% | ₺1.38m17% | ₺1.61m17% |
| Depreciation | −₺418k | −₺418k | −₺418k |
| Interest (incl. BSMV) | ₺0 | ₺0 | ₺0 |
| Tax (indicative) | ₺0 | ₺0 | −₺115k |
| Net profit | −₺633k-13% | ₺913k11% | ₺1.02m11% |
The curve starts where the money goes out: month 0 sits ₺4.80m below zero. The month it crosses the zero line is the month the investment is back; everything above it is cash earned beyond the investment.
| Metric | Pessimistic | Base | Optimistic | Stress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year-2 net revenue | ₺6.34m | ₺8.28m | ₺9.46m | ₺5.64m |
| Year-2 EBITDA | −₺267k | ₺1.38m | ₺2.60m | −₺1.39m |
| Year-2 EBITDA margin | -4.2% | 16.7% | 27.5% | -24.6% |
| Payback (months) | — | 49 | 27 | — |
| Additional funding need | ₺0 | ₺0 | ₺0 | ₺3.23m |
| Month cash runs out | — | — | — | 11 |
Stress case: pessimistic plus high inflation, a mid-year wage hike and a fit-out overrun (additional).
The founder is a first-time F&B operator; the learning curve hits cost and quality in the first six months.
Mitigation: Hire an experienced chef or manager before opening; check references; find an advisor.
Break-even needs 66 customers/day; the plan is 80. Safety margin 18%.
Mitigation: Pre-opening footfall count, three competitor menu checks, soft opening, 90-day marketing budget.
Labor is 24% of revenue. January minimum-wage steps (est. 27%, 21%) and a possible mid-year hike hit margin directly.
Mitigation: Reprice the menu with wage steps; cross-train staff; shift planning.
Costs move monthly while the menu reprices every 3 months; each extra 10 points of inflation costs ~1.2 points of gross margin.
Mitigation: Monthly cost tracking, supplier terms, quarterly repricing, focused menu.
Commercial landlords routinely ask for security beyond the deposit — promissory notes, a bank guarantee letter or a personal surety, often several months' rent; for a new venture it is the norm. That amount is not in the investment budget.
Mitigation: Settle the type and amount of security in writing before signing; budget the cost of a bank guarantee letter (2-4% a year) and prefer it to promissory notes.
No place yet; rent is the district average and equals 12% of mature-year sales. A real offer moves this ratio either way.
Mitigation: 5+5 year lease with renewal option, licence-conditional break clause, registered lease annotation; rent in TRY.
Governance commitment
80 customers a day at maturity, 40 of them dine-in: 13.6 average active seats (12 indoor + 4 outdoor, weighted by the months the terrace is usable) × 5.5 theoretical turns × 54% occupancy (FIZIBI assumption). Break-even needs 66; safety margin 18%.
Year-1 net income becomes −₺1.07m (base −₺633k). The pessimistic case combines it with −15% occupancy and a slow ramp: additional funding need ₺0.
Rent-to-revenue is 12%; 24%/18%/14% increases at lease anniversaries are modelled. Payback stays within 36 months until rent rises by 1%.
Labor is 24% of revenue; January steps of 2027 27%, 2028 21% and an employer-cost factor of 1.33 are in the model. Menu prices are updated every 3 months; a repricing in the wage-step month is essential.
Simple payback is 49 months; discounted 120+ months. Year-2 cash-on-cash 34%.
No equity is offered yet; the plan has a ₺3.60m unfunded gap and does not close as designed. How that amount is filled — partner equity, debt, or a staged raise — is open to discussion.
Contingency of ₺206k and 4 months of working capital (₺1.04m) are budgeted. The stress case (fit-out +15%, high inflation, mid-year wage step) shows an additional need of ₺3.23m. Investment per seat is ₺183k (reference ₺189k).
Founder experience (likelihood 5/5, impact 4/5). Mitigation: Hire an experienced chef or manager before opening; check references; find an advisor.
Answers are derived from the model's numbers; rehearse them in your own words before the meeting.
The executive assessment line by line; the four figures on the summary slide come from this table.
| Line | YEAR 1 | 10-YEAR AVERAGE · NOMINAL | Executive comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| REVENUE | ₺4.85m56 customers a day · ₺264 realised avg. ticket (incl. VAT) · revenue is net of VAT | ₺14.2m / year10-year average | At 80 customers a day and a ₺316 average ticket (in year-2 prices), year 2 net revenue is ₺8.28m. Against the location, 40 m², 12 seats and 54% expected occupancy, the revenue assumption looks conservative (monthly sales per m² are 41% below the industry reference). The 10-year average is nominal: most of the gap over year 1 is the price level, not real growth. |
| COST OF GOODS | ₺1.25m · 25.7% | ₺3.60m · 25.4%10-year average | In year 2 cost of goods is 25.5% of revenue. Against the 25.0% industry reference for comparable specialty coffee concepts this is in line, and over 10 years the ratio holds steady. |
| PAYROLL | ₺1.65m · 34.0%2 people | ₺3.57m · 25.1%10-year average | In year 2 payroll is 23.9% of revenue with 2 people planned. Against the 24%–30% industry band this is low, and over 10 years the ratio improves. A low ratio should not be read as a win on its own; opening hours, shift patterns and the service model have to be checked before the staffing plan is treated as operationally realistic. |
| OTHER COSTS | ₺1.30m · 26.9% | ₺3.16m · 22.2%10-year average | Other operating costs — energy, maintenance, cleaning, consumables, card and platform commission and marketing — are 21.6% of revenue, which is reasonable for this concept, and over 10 years the ratio improves. |
| RENT + SERVICE CHARGE | ₺825k · 17.0% | ₺1.78m · 12.6%10-year average | Rent and service charges are 12.4% of revenue, which is sustainable against the revenue the plan expects to generate, and over 10 years the ratio improves. Rent can rise at most 1% before payback exceeds 36 months. |
| EBITDA | −₺174k · -3.6% | ₺2.09m · 14.7%10-year average | The EBITDA margin is 16.7% in year 2 (-3.6% in year 1, 14.7% on the 10-year average). Its path from the first year to the long-run average shows the operation strengthening; reading the revenue and operating cost assumptions together, the profitability level is realistic and sustainable. |
| NET OPERATING CASH | ₺196k | ₺1.86m / year10-year average | The venue generates ₺196k of operating cash in year 1 and ₺1.86m a year on average over 10 years. After debt service and replacement capex the horizon generates ₺17.7m in total, 3.7x the ₺4.80m invested. Long-run cash generation is strong for the financial sustainability of the investment. |
| PAYBACK | 4.1 yr49 months | 10 yr+discounted at 40% | The ₺4.80m investment is expected to come back in 4.1 years (49 months), which is long for an investment of this size and the operating cash it generates. |
| IRR | 30%nominal | 13%real · hurdle 40% | The internal rate of return is 30% against a 40% hurdle. Read together with the size of the investment, the payback period and the operating risks, the expected return is low. |
| Item | TRY | EUR | USD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total investment | ₺4,799,845 | €86k | $101k |
| Fit-out, equipment, furniture | ₺2,058,461 | €37k | $43k |
| Working capital | ₺1,036,517 | €19k | $22k |
| Monthly rent | ₺55,000 | €991 | $1,158 |
| Average ticket (VAT incl.) | ₺240 | €4 | $5 |
| Year-1 net revenue | ₺4,846,630 | €87k | $102k |
| Year-2 net revenue | ₺8,281,823 | €149k | $174k |
| Year-2 EBITDA | ₺1,380,745 | €25k | $29k |
| Year-2 net income | ₺912,969 | €16k | $19k |
| End of year-10 value (terminal) | ₺1,407,363 | €25k | $30k |
Arka Sokak Kahve · Ayşe Demir · Contact: add your contact details in section 8
This presentation is a projection, not investment advice. All figures rely on user inputs and dated industry assumptions; actual results may differ. · Prepared with FIZIBI · Marginal — redesign (51/100)